DOJ says Yale still plays favorites
As Yale celebrated another big graduation milestone, the school’s medical admissions office got hit with a serious charge. The Department of Justice sent Yale School of Medicine a letter saying it found evidence that Yale “continues to intentionally discriminate against applicants based on their race.” That is not a small paperwork issue. It is a direct accusation that a top medical school may still be sorting students by skin color in a country where the Supreme Court already said that is not allowed. The DOJ says black and Hispanic applicants were admitted at much higher rates than white and Asian applicants with similar grades and MCAT scores, and the gap was so large it “cannot be explained by a coincidence.”
Good scores do not make illegal discrimination legal
Some defenders tried to shrug this off by saying every Yale admit is already brilliant, so what does it matter if race helps break the tie? That sounds neat until the law walks into the room and ruins the party. The Supreme Court did not say schools must pick only the highest test scores. It said race cannot be used as a factor in admissions, period. A school may consider many things, from leadership to life experience, but it cannot use racial identity as a decision point and then act shocked when somebody notices. If that were legal, every institution could just rename discrimination “holistic review” and call it a day. Nice try, but no.
The DOJ says Yale had the clues in plain sight
According to the letter, Yale used a “holistic metrics model” from the Association of American Medical Colleges, and that model listed race and national origin as factors for admissions staff to consider. The DOJ also said Yale’s admissions results did not change after the Students for Fair Admissions ruling, which is a problem because Yale itself had once argued that no race-neutral alternative would produce the diversity it wanted. In other words, Yale appears to have told the courts that race was necessary, then kept admissions patterns in place after the courts said race was not allowed. That is not subtle. That is the kind of thing that makes watchdogs reach for their reading glasses and their legal pads at the same time.
The real issue is equal treatment, not excuses
Some commentators keep making a familiar mistake. They argue that black and Hispanic applicants must have faced more hardship, while white and Asian applicants must have come from easier paths. That may be true in some cases and false in others, but race alone does not tell you any of that. Real merit can include grit, sacrifice, and overcoming hard circumstances, but those things have to be proven by facts, not guessed from skin color. Conservatives have been warning for years that identity-based admissions always lead to double standards, and now the DOJ says Yale may be living proof. The law does not allow a school to punish one applicant group and reward another just because the bureaucrats like the look of the numbers.
https://x.com/JeffAnderson_/status/2055150455865356308?s=20
https://x.com/drterrysimpson/status/2056038456074387811?s=20
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
Leave a Comment