It seems there are some misunderstandings in the narrative presented by the New York Post regarding the alleged assassination attempt on Donald Trump. The piece authored by Dana Kennedy, falsely branded as an exclusive, reiterates points already reported six months prior without acknowledging prior investigative work. Thomas Crooks is accused of firing eight shots at then-candidate Donald Trump during the Butler Farm Show in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024, allegedly from the roof of the AGR Building. While private investigator Doug Hagmann delved into geofencing data and conducted interviews, experiencing resistance from the FBI, the article largely overlooks the substantial evidence previously unearthed by other credible sources.
The claim by the FBI that Crooks accessed the roof using a ladder purchased on the morning of the incident was debunked by the Gateway Pundit. Additionally, law enforcement agencies were dishonest about the status of body cameras and the availability of footage from the event, maintaining a narrative full of inconsistencies. The FBI’s assertion that Crooks’ motivations remain unknown, coupled with their focus on foreign ties, has only fueled public speculation. Their vague references to “overseas encrypted accounts” could easily pertain to commonly used services like Coinbase and Protonmail, misleading the public about the depth of Crooks’ foreign connections.
The connection suggested between Crooks and foreign entities, including Iran, is seen by many as disingenuous, potentially being part of a broader misleading narrative propagated by organizations with ulterior agendas. Notably, OversightPR Project has previously detailed these data points with greater impact, questioning the authenticity and intentions behind such narratives. Despite the FBI’s efforts to frame Crooks’ motivations as externally influenced, there are deeper inconsistencies that still require examination.
For instance, expert insights have highlighted peculiarities in the crime scene evidence. Observations regarding blood splatter patterns, discrepancies in Crooks’ injury descriptions, and the stark differences in his physical attributes compared to those of the deceased body on the roof all raise red flags. Furthermore, Dr. Mollie James pointed out previously ignored injuries—such as a possible close-range gunshot wound to Crooks’ head and neck area—suggesting an alternative series of events leading to his death.
Someone who regularly visited Crooks home and work also visited a building in Washington, DC located in Gallery Place.
This is in the same vicinity of an @FBI office on June 26, 2023.
Who’s device is this? pic.twitter.com/b9ZIO5utDC
— Oversight Project (@OversightPR) July 22, 2024
Most critically, the delay in action by snipers stationed on the second floor of the AGR building remains unexplained. Questions arise as to why they purportedly observed Crooks for over 45 minutes as he positioned himself, while a crowd reportedly urged them to intervene against the alleged threat. Such inaction calls into question the official narrative and warrants further investigation to ensure justice and transparency.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
Leave a Comment