Mark Zuckerberg, the tech mogul who once played the role of the Democrats’ sugar daddy in 2020, now wants us to believe he’s the champion of free speech. Yes, the same guy who funneled millions in Zuckerbucks to prop up Biden’s campaign and enabled the very censorship that throttled conservative voices is now waving the First Amendment flag. Call me skeptical, but this transformation feels about as sincere as Kamala Harris’s laugh at a border crisis press conference.
During a three-hour chat with Joe Rogan, Zuckerberg casually spilled the tea: the Biden administration pressured Facebook to suppress not just “misinformation” but actual truths about vaccine side effects. Yes, folks, truth. As in facts. As in the stuff Big Tech and Big Government colluded to hide. Of course, Zuckerberg stopped short of a full-blown mea culpa, but he admitted that the administration’s demands were so heavy-handed they made his own censorship policies seem downright amateurish.
From Zuckerbucks to Free Speech Defender?
Let’s not forget, Zuckerberg wasn’t exactly a neutral player in 2020. His $400+ million infusion into “election integrity” efforts through grants to local governments was a game-changer—for Biden. And now, after years of erasing conservative pages faster than Biden can mumble through a speech, Zuckerberg wants us to believe he’s had an epiphany about the dangers of censorship.
Forgive me if I don’t break out the party hats just yet. Sure, it’s nice to hear Zuck admit that silencing dissent—even when it’s true—is problematic. But the guy who greenlit the takedown of countless small businesses, advocacy groups, and alternative media outlets isn’t suddenly our free speech savior.
Why Now, Zuck?
Here’s the kicker: Zuckerberg’s newfound “commitment” to free speech comes as Trump is preparing to move back into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Coincidence? Not likely. Zuckerberg knows which way the political winds are blowing, and he’s desperate to keep Meta off Trump’s radar.
This isn’t about principle; it’s about survival. By pivoting to a more neutral stance and scrapping third-party fact-checkers, Zuckerberg is trying to cozy up to the new administration. Oh, and let’s not forget Meta’s recent addition of Trump ally Joel Kaplan as head of global affairs. Nothing screams “please don’t break us up” louder than that move.
The Damage Is Done
While it’s great to think Meta’s algorithm might become less hostile to conservative pages like The Independent American, let’s not lose sight of the damage already inflicted. Thousands of pages were wiped out during the Biden-era censorship blitz, leaving creators, small businesses, and communities in ruins. And those pages? They’re not coming back.
Zuckerberg’s “oops, my bad” doesn’t cut it for the countless individuals and organizations who relied on Facebook for their livelihood or to spread messages that didn’t align with leftist orthodoxy. And let’s not forget the chilling effect this has had on free speech—because nothing says “trust us” like a company that erased your voice for years.
What About Biden?
President “C’mon, Man” himself isn’t taking Zuckerberg’s pivot lightly. Biden blasted Meta’s decision to ditch fact-checking as “shameful,” lamenting that a billionaire could decide what millions of people see. Newsflash, Joe: that’s exactly what Zuckerberg was doing when he helped you win in 2020. Pot, meet kettle.
Of course, Biden’s outrage conveniently ignores the administration’s role in pressuring Facebook to censor dissent. According to Zuckerberg, government officials screamed, cursed, and bullied Facebook into submission. But sure, let’s blame free speech for killing people, right, Joe?
The Bigger Picture
What’s clear here is that Zuckerberg’s pivot isn’t about doing the right thing—it’s about self-preservation. He’s angling to stay in Trump’s good graces and protect his empire from the very government overreach he helped empower.
And while it’s hard to believe Zuckerberg’s sincerity, we can hope that Meta’s shift will result in a more balanced playing field. After all, if the algorithm stops throttling pages like The Independent American, that’s a win for everyone who values free expression—even if it’s coming from a man who only recently discovered its importance.
Final Thoughts
Zuckerberg’s admission is a step in the right direction, but let’s not forget the years of damage caused by his compliance with censorship demands. His sudden shift feels more like a calculated move than a genuine change of heart.
Still, if this leads to a more friendly algorithm for conservative voices, we’ll take it. Just don’t expect us to throw a parade for a billionaire who’s only now realizing that free speech matters when his bottom line is on the line.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
Leave a Comment